2019/21 | LEM Working Paper Series | ||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
Shaping individual preferences for social protection: the case of platform workers |
|||||||||||||||||
Francesco Bogliacino, Valeria Cirillo, Cristiano Codagnone, Marta Fana, Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva and Giuseppe A Veltri |
|||||||||||||||||
Keywords | |||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
employment; preferences; work; economic behavior.
|
|||||||||||||||||
JEL Classifications | |||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
J32, J40, C21.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Abstract | |||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
Workers who perform their occupations through platforms are becoming an
increasing share of the labour force. The debate is polarized between
those arguing for platforms as an instrument to increase flexibility and
labor force participation, and those who see it as a further mechanism
to increase Non Standard Work (NSW). This debate is policy relevant
because in either case, platform participation is associated to a
difference in terms of willingness to contribute to the social security
system. Nevertheless, the evidence is scant because we lack reliable data
sources. In this contribution, we use a dedicated survey to estimate
Willingness to Pay (WTP) for social security and estimate the causal
impact of platform participation using a selection on observable strategy.
We found that platform workers are less disposed to contribute to social
security, although perception of accessibility and adequacy are not affected.
Results are robust to specifications and multiple hypotheses testing.
|
Downloads
|
![]() ![]() |
|
![]()
|
![]() |